CFP: Chapters on Conspiracies and Visual Culture

DWD Featured Image Feb 9, 2026

Conspiracies and Visual CultureEditor Information: Stephanie Beene (sbeene@unm.edu) and Katie Greer (greer@oakland.edu)AbstractConspiracy ideation in America is on the rise and has infected popular culture and social media. This phenomenon is deeply concerning, not least because it moves beyond fringe groups to influence mainstream discourse and belief systems. Despite extensive academic work on the psychological underpinnings of conspiracy belief and the linguistic/rhetorical analysis of related texts, a crucial gap remains. Specifically, there is an underdeveloped area of study concerning the sophisticated and widespread influence of the visual, not only in disseminating conspiracy ideation generally but at the juncture where it intersects with evangelical subcultures. The information landscape is currently saturated with visual content designed to sow distrust and disseminate disinformation. The tools of digital media creation have become powerful vectors for this spread. Examples abound, from the unsettling realism of DeepFake TikToks and sophisticated AI-generated imagery, which blur the lines between reality and fiction, to seemingly innocuous visuals—photographs, charts, or video clips—that are removed from their original, legitimate contexts and weaponized to promote baseless narratives.  The ease of production and viral distribution of this visual misinformation and disinformation means that educators must become acutely aware of the mechanisms by which visuals, more than just text, are influencing conspiracy ideation in novel and increasingly alarming ways.To effectively combat this rising tide of visual disinformation, there is an urgent need for scholarly and practical intervention. Incorporating robust frameworks of visual literacy—the ability to interpret, negotiate, and make meaning from information presented in images—and the broader concept of metaliteracy—the comprehensive understanding of how to produce, evaluate, and share information across various media—can significantly enhance our collective ability to analyze and deconstruct these narratives. This approach would allow us to move beyond simply identifying a conspiracy and delve into how semiotics and imagery—the signs, symbols, and visual language employed—influence and solidify conspiracy beliefs. Addressing the visual dimension of this crisis represents a crucial step toward filling a significant, and currently dangerous, gap in current scholarship and public awareness, especially as it relates to communities where these visual narratives are most readily accepted.This edited volume aims to bring together leading scholars from both conspiracy studies and visual literacy studies to examine visual messaging in conspiracy theory culture.The book will be divided into the following sections:Part 1: The participatory environment: Visuals and conspiracy engagementPart 2: Hidden messages: The semiotics of visuals in conspiracy communitiesPart 3: Critical visual thinking: Educating for conspiracy avoidancePart 4: Nefarious Tropes: Historical intersections of visuals and conspiracy theoriesChapter topics could include:Visual analysis of conspiracist aesthetics on social mediaMis/ mal/disinformation as political toolsVisual Literacy to inoculate against conspiracismGenerative artificial intelligence and conspiracy visual cultureAnalyses of the attention economy, platform capitalism, or recommendation algorithms driving conspiracist content“Do your own research” communities or movementsHistorical analyses of the use of visuals to promote conspiracy theoriesCultural influences of conspiracy theoriesGender and sexuality studies and the “manosphere” or “trad” communitiesInformation overload & cultureCognitive visual processing and conspiracy imageryLogistics and TimelineProposals between 250 and 500 words, CVs, and brief author bios (50-80 words) should besubmitted to Stephanie Beene (sbeene@unm.edu) and Katie Greer(greer@oakland.edu) by COB July 31, 2026.The editors will review all submitted proposals and notify applicants by COB August 31, 2026.Chapters should be approximately between 7,000-8,000 words, and first drafts of completedmanuscripts will be due COB March 31, 2027. The expected publication date will be in 2028.   Read original article: Read More


Discover more from DrWeb's Domain

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comments

Leave Your Comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from DrWeb's Domain

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Verified by MonsterInsights